I for one am not in need of such insights and opinion but am grateful for babrams posting. A fascinating and lucid post that is informative and educational from an obviously learned fellow.
Thanx babram.
Thanx babram.
This turns out to be useful info.
I just logged onto the percaindonesia site
and found the ConCourt case no.
69/PUU-XIII/2015, indicating the
complaint contesting Act No. 5 of 1960
was only filed sometime this year.
So my staff is now busy obtaining a
docket sheet indexing all filings in chrono.
Am also getting my hands on Act No. 5.
Can't thank you enough for giving
me the link to the site.
I'll take it from here, feedbacking you
(& by extension, all readers) along
the way.
This is real progress. Much appreciated.
Regards,
balisafeharbor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Still need to read the court file, which with all the translations, may take time, but it
sure looks like its the the marriage law is in conflict with the Agraria law of 1960, which
the plaintiffs say controls. I believe they are correct and that the marriage law cannot dilute
the land ownership rights conferred by Agraria.