Omicron set to dominate and overwhelm’ the world in 3-6 months says doctor

Markit

Metter wrote Having been forwarded one of his video's (on vaccine injections) I can give my view that he is biased, misquotes mainstream research and over quotes research which has not been peer reviewed.

Is your "view" based on some professional expertise or is it just a personal opinion? I would be grateful for some of your info links? How is it possible to be "biased" on vaccine injections - they are either correctly done or not. Does it take so much more effort to pull the plunger back to make sure you're not in a vein before injecting the vaccine? Would also be interested in which quotes you reckon have not been peer reviewed? I really don't have an axe to grind for Dr. Cambell but simply find him the most informative source in one place on a number of Covid based issues. If you have a better one I'd be happy to check it out too!?

Metter

Markit wrote Is your "view" based on some professional expertise or is it just a personal opinion? The video on the vaccine administration which I am critical of - yes is based on professional expertise as a nurse who gives injections and follows best practice advice. How is it possible to be "biased" on vaccine injections - they are either correctly done or not. Does it take so much more effort to pull the plunger back to make sure you're not in a vein before injecting the vaccine? He cites research that suggests that the vaccine has been given IV because their is no aspiration on the deltoid when given. If there is no aspiration, therefore no sighted blood it is impossible to make an assumption that the vaccine was given IM. The best practice guidelines are that deltoid injections should not be aspirated - studies observing several hundred correctly given deltoid injections across multiple givers found no evidence of a blood vessel being hit. Would also be interested in which quotes you reckon have not been peer reviewed? It is the research paper he uses which is not peer reviewed. I really don't have an axe to grind for Dr. Cambell but simply find him the most informative source in one place on a number of Covid based issues. I can't draw a conclusion on all of his videos but I found the one I watched ill informed and lacking, especially for someone of his credentials. He cites one paper which is not peer reviewed and presents it as fact and fails to present contrary evidence of which there are peer reviewed research articles. I did do a search of research into the harm of the Covid vaccine being given IV by accident and failed to find any sources other than the one he cites. Even the manufactories in their administration information do not have any guidance in a need to aspirate. To aspirate is common and normal in some muscles but not the deltoid. If you have a better one I'd be happy to check it out too!? I tend just to read research papers that videos (I'm boring like that).

Markit

He cites research that suggests that the vaccine has been given IV because their is no aspiration on the deltoid when given. If there is no aspiration, therefore no sighted blood it is impossible to make an assumption that the vaccine was given IM.[COLOR=rgb(226, 80, 65)] I think you may have the wrong end of this stick - he says that without the vaccination being aspirated it's impossible to tell if it's been given in the muscle or in the vein. If you see blood when aspirating then you're in a vein True or false? [/COLOR] The best practice guidelines are that deltoid injections should not be aspirated - studies observing several hundred correctly given deltoid injections across multiple givers found no evidence of a blood vessel being hit. [COLOR=rgb(226, 80, 65)]It would be impossible to tell if a blood vessel was hit unless the vaccination was aspired OR?[/COLOR]

If you haven't yet died of boredom here's one of the fact check thingys - https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/incorrect-vaccine-administration-is-a-potential-cause-of-post-vaccine-adverse-effects-but-more-research-is-still-needed-to-confirm-or-reject-this-hypothesis/

Metter

I agree with Markit's points... What's the evidence of Dr. Campbell's bias? Quoting research that has not been peer reviewed is not a crime, and I do believe he mentions that his sources of information are or are not peer reviewed, as the case may be. What I like about him is that he is not afraid to call out the establishment (eg governments, regulators and big pharma) for their biases and profit/power motives.

I don't have an issue with

If you haven't yet died of boredom here's one of the fact check thingys - https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/incorrect-vaccine-administration-is-a-potential-cause-of-post-vaccine-adverse-effects-but-more-research-is-still-needed-to-confirm-or-reject-this-hypothesis/

Thanks Markit, Yes I do get what he was saying about impossible to tell - But what he is suggesting is bad injection practice, when in fact the lack of aspiration is good practice. He fails to acknowledge or reference the researched and evidenced based harm that proper aspiration can cause (proper aspiration is a vacuum being created for 5-10 seconds) - he portrays the risk of an accidental IV administration as a real risk - research on observed aspiration found no blood vessels affected. Of course what constitutes best practice changes over time and research on the AZ vaccine may influence best practice but to be selective in the information is just a biased display for ratings - in my humble view.

« Previous Page