Markit wrote
Ok if you are gonna give your analysis of everyone elses choices in news sources lets hear yours ? I also listen to UnHerd a web based source that seems quite good, mixed with a liberal dosage of "Guardian" BS and a dose of salt...
[B]Did I do [U]that[/U]?[/B]
[I]...Analyze everyone elses (sic) choices in news sources? [/I]
I was merely[I] [/I]suggesting caution in what we read (and believe).
Everybody is biased to some degree. If not, everybody would be the same, then no need for multiple news sites, newspapers, web forums, etc.
Since you asked, here are a few sources I frequent. Not that I believe everything is true on them, but I believe it's probably best to weigh up multiple opinions (according to my own biases), and come to my own biased conclusions. Seems fair to me.
ABC (Australia), BBC, Arirang (S Korea), The Japan Times, The Harvard Crimson, The Times of India, South China Morning Post, Deutsche Welle( DW - Germany), Tempo (Indonesia), Jakarta Post, Bali Discovery, thelocal.se (Sweden), pursuit.unimelb.edu.au (University of Melbourne), The Conversation (Australia), New Scientist, National Geographic, NASA, The Straits Times (Singapore), Bangkok Post, Phuket Times, Al Jazerra, The Simpsons, Gruen (Australia on advertising everywhere) and many others.
:cool: