As the Australian Gov't knew well that Indonesia has the death penalty for drug smugglers, many say that the AFP should have waited till the criminals actually did the crime of importing into Australia, then catch them redhanded.
Australia, as with many other countries, has an international policy of non co-operating with nations who execute criminals.
link...
https://www.humanrights.gov.au/news/speeches/death-penalty-matter-principle.
For example....Currently Malaysia wants to extradite a Malaysian policeman, found guilty of murdering a model in Malaysia, who then illegally entered Australia as he knew they wouldn't extradite due his sentence is execution....
Mongolian model's Malaysian murderer arrested in Australia | Reuters
Another example was an American accused of drowning his wife on their honeymoon on the Great Barrier Reef but, as he came from Alabama, a State with the death penalty, Australia would not extradite without some assurances. link...
Australia in dilemma over deportation of Honeymoon Killer to the U.S.
This is the type of comparison I believe Tintin was making....if the AFP are so diligent in applying Australian principles in other cases...how come they weren't in the Bali 9 case. The Australian Gov't ruled out that any wrong was done but there are many who believe that Australia did not comply with its own principles.
IMHO...Either the AFP were given assurances by the RI Gov't which were not kept.....or they made a grave error and aren't prepared to admit.