balipod-admin
The restriction should now be in effect that you have to have made at least 20 posts on the forum before you can access this section. I changed the forum description to reflect this change.Some people want to have the section, others don't. I thought if we are going to have a member's section, we should at least have some restrictions to accessing it. It's impossible to check through every person who joins this forum, so at least if someone has made 20 posts, we can get some idea about the person and their motivation for posting here. Of course this does not mean the forum should be used for any other reason as to why it was [URL='https://balipod.com/forum/threads/use-of-this-members-only-forum.1695/']initially created[/URL].It may also give a little motivation to encourage people to participate in the forum. :icon_biggrin:
JohnnyCool
I thought if we are going to have a member's section, we should at least have some restrictions to accessing it. It's impossible to check through every person who joins this forum[/QUOTE]Pardon me if I sound thick as a brick but I'm still finding it hard to understand why a so-called extra "member's section" is either necessary or desirable? As I've said before, everybody who registers becomes a "member". What's postable in it that can't be posted in the main area? What [B]is[/B] the point?It can't be for "security" reasons. Even as Bert himself stated before:[I]Allthough this area is not available for guests, it is only for members, I cannot guarantee that people you rather have not seeing your posts, will not see it anyway in this area. Its not more "safe" or secure.I just created it not to scare off people registering, actually.The same rules (and considerations) apply to this forum as to any other forum here.[/I] [/QUOTE]This "member's only section" simply creates a two-tiered membership hierarchy with absolutely no advantage for anyone, as far as I can see.The job of keeping an eye on malicious posters can be farmed out to voluntary moderators. This can work quite well if the "moderators" are not idiots in the first place, or become drunk with their perceived powers.If there is a need for a kind of [I]exclusive member's area[/I], why not have them [B]pay[/B] for a subscription? In other words, the forum would then have a free section and a paid-for one. I doubt that this would be very popular and simply alienate many existing "members". And I bet there would be next to no takers!It may also give a little motivation to encourage people to participate in the forum.[/QUOTE]I think this is a specious statement. How and why would it? Beats me.:icon_e_ugeek:
balipod-admin
If someone has a certain "sensitive" topic that they would like to discuss on the forum, but not have the whole world know about it, then this [I]might[/I] be the place to do it. The problem with not restricting it at all seemed to me, not to have any meaning. People could simply register to the forum, not make any posts and still have access.Restricting it by post count is a very small way of knowing just something about the people who might be reading this. If there is a need for a kind of [I]exclusive member's area[/I], why not have them [B]pay[/B] for a subscription? In other words, the forum would then have a free section and a paid-for one. I doubt that this would be very popular and simply alienate many existing "members". And I bet there would be next to no takers![/QUOTE]Not that I am considering this, but many forums operate on this kind of model. I also doubt anyone here would pay a subscription, but who knows? If the money went to some kind of charity, why not?
JohnnyCool
If someone has a certain "sensitive" topic that they would like to discuss on the forum, but not have the whole world know about it, then this [I]might[/I] be the place to do it. The problem with not restricting it at all seemed to me, not to have any meaning. People could simply register to the forum, not make any posts and still have access.[/QUOTE]So what?Apart from Bert's sensitive revelations in the past, most people would not spill their guts on a forum like this, or even in a "member's section" here. "Sensitive" or very private stuff shouldn't be visible to anybody except for the people involved. Don't you think?Someone registers here. Twenty posts later they have access to PMs, user profiles, and whatever. I'm sorry, but this approach is still pissing in the wind.[I]Not that I am considering this, but many forums operate on this kind of model. I also doubt anyone here would pay a subscription, but who knows? If the money went to some kind of charity, why not?[/I][/QUOTE]Why not indeed? But what would they get to see in the "executive" member's only section?Promote all the charities you like on the main pages. Nothing wrong with that. Easy to do."Members" are "members", IMHO. There is [B]no[/B] real reason that I can think of to create two types of "members" on a forum site like this.Think again, or more.:icon_rolleyes:
Markit
So what?"Members" are "members", IMHO. There is [B]no[/B] real reason that I can think of to create two types of "members" on a forum site like this.Think again, or more.:icon_rolleyes:[/QUOTE]Luckily JC your ability to think of something isn't the measure of all things. I have added a thread to the members only forum and if you read it maybe you will "think again, or more." I hope it is allowed to stay, but it is not for general consumption. IMHO
calitobali
I would agree that thread is good for that section, since it could possibly stir up a few comments that a brand new member might not appreciate seeing had they not gotten introduced to the forum yet.Also if I had a question that I wanted to make sure gave me the opinion of mostly people whom I was already familiar with and could therefore trust the opinions given better, I would post it in the members section.
JohnnyCool
[I]Luckily JC your ability to think of something isn't the measure of all things.[/I] [/QUOTE]Presumably, yours is.
Markit
So what?There is no real reason that I can think of to create two types of "members" on a forum site like this.Think again, or more.:icon_rolleyes:[/QUOTE] Personally I found the tone of your post condescending and the final bit of your wit "think again, or more" insulting, even though it wasn't pointed at me. My point was exactly as I said, but nicer than you did. But I see that has fallen on deaf ears (eyes) so more bluntly: You are wrong in this instance and maybe you should think again, or better before being so hasty to pass judgement.
OrangeDragon
Above drama aside... "Woooh, I made it to the inner sanctum!"Was what I came here to say... lol.
Markit
Above drama aside..."Woooh, I made it to the inner sanctum!"Was what I came here to say... lol.[/QUOTE]Back when most of us where still young, dumb and fulla ....bintang.
spicyayam
Hope you weren't too disappointed
OrangeDragon
Hope you weren't too disappointed[/QUOTE]The dancing girls were a bit lackluster.... Probably because they were over the hill expat gents in miniskirts. But ya know... A shows a show.
